Module Descriptors
TERM PROJECT (DUAL AWARD)
ACCT67007
Key Facts
Digital, Technology, Innovation and Business
Level 6
40 credits
Contact
Leader: Mayowa Akinbote
Hours of Study
Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities: 10
Independent Study Hours: 390
Total Learning Hours: 400
Pattern of Delivery
  • Occurrence A, Guangxi Minzu University, UG Semester 2
Sites
  • Guangxi Minzu University
Assessment
  • PROJECT STUDY & EVALUATION weighted at 80%
  • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PRESENTATION weighted at 20%
Module Details
LEARNING OUTCOMES

Employ a range of critical evaluation techniques to demonstrate a systematic awareness, understanding and knowledge of contemporary accounting and finance issues associated with the project topic

Knowledge and understanding

Demonstrate intellectual and entrepreneurial skills in the application of accounting and finance competencies, together with a practical understanding of how established accounting and finance techniques are applied in the context of the project topic

Application, Learning & Reflection

Demonstrate a conceptual understanding and critical awareness of contemporary developments in accounting and finance as they relate to the project topic.

Analysis & Enquiry

Devise and apply valid evaluation and investigative techniques to interpret complex business challenges and propose solutions in the context of the project topic.

Problem Solving & Communication

ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENT DETAILS
A project study & evaluation (80%). A 8,000-word submission incorporating: Critical assessment & evaluation drawing on relevant & contemporary theory & frameworks and reasoned conclusions. LO 2-4

Executive summary presentation (20%). A 15-minute presentation followed by Q&A to a panel of 2 nominated academic staff.- LO1.
INDICATIVE CONTENT
Learning

Identify a suitable approach & methodology to prepare and conduct an investigation into a problem/practice-based individual Term Project.

Characterise, evaluate & critically reason conclusions and/or recommendations with reference to appropriate underpinning theory and/or frameworks.

Practice

Conduct a critical reasoned evaluation from analysis of secondary data and/or primary research to draw robust conclusions & make recommendations relating to an approved problem/practice-based topic.

Evaluate the wider implications of Project conclusions and how they relate more generally to business.

Reflect critically on the underpinning accounting and finance skills as they relate to the Project topic.
WEB DESCRIPTOR
The undergraduate project represents an opportunity for all undergraduate students to select a suitable topic and demonstrate their knowledge and understanding of the contemporary issue in accounting and finance. Topics will be wide-ranging drawing on different aspects of business but all aiming to address a specific business challenge or problem.
LEARNING STRATEGIES
The student will follow the proposal agreed in the Research Methods module and will continue working with the supervisor identified on the basis of the topic.



10 hours 1:1 Project supervision



Independent study - drawing on T&L across accounting and finance topics. The term project should be based on the proposal presented/ approved in research methods module.



All projects will be assigned a principal academic supervisor.



Project evaluation methodology plus 10 hours F2F 1:1 academic consultation in addition to c.390 hours of independent research - 400 hours total.



One to one session plays a crucial role in the learning process, where formative assessments are essential for providing ongoing feedback to both students and the teaching team. Examples of formative assessments include draft submissions, and peer reviews, all of which help gauge students' understanding of the course material. These assessments enable instructors to identify areas where students may need additional support and adjust teaching strategies as needed. This practical implementation ensures that even in a remote learning environment, students receive the necessary support and preparation for their summative assessments.



Feedback and feedforward on this module in the dual award program would follow the steps implemented:

Cross-Institution Moderation: Implement a moderation process where a sample of feedback from both institutions is reviewed collaboratively. This allows for adjustments to be made to ensure that the quality and tone of feedback are aligned.

Structured Feedforward: Both institutions would follow a consistent approach to feedforward, providing clear, actionable advice on how students can improve in future assessments. This helps students apply feedback effectively across all their modules.

Unified Rubrics: Develop shared grading rubrics and feedback templates for both institutions. This ensures that students receive consistent criteria, depth, and format feedback, whether the module is taught by one institution or co-taught.

Encouraging Reflection: Students would be encouraged to reflect on the feedback they receive and discuss how they will implement it. This practice ensures that feedback is understood and applied consistently, contributing to a cohesive learning experience.

Shared VLE: Use a shared Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) to submit assignments and deliver feedback. This ensures that all feedback is stored in one place, allowing both institutions to monitor and align the feedback provided.



TEXTS
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., 2018, Research Methods for Business Students, London, FT Prentice-Hall.

Brooks, C., 2019.żEViews Guide for Introductory Econometrics for Finance. Cambridge University Press.

RESOURCES
VLE learning support material.

Module handbook.

Directed texts.

Supporting research methodology lecture material.

Selected PPBL case examples

Academic Journals

Industry reports
SPECIAL ADMISSIONS REQUIREMENTS


Data Analysis Software i.e.; Bloomberg terminal, EViews, STATA and SPSS