This module provides both a contextual basis for the supervisors of research students and an opportunity for them to develop their supervisory skills through discussion with practitioners and critical reflection upon their own practice. From an initial review of current issues in postgraduate research supervision and the current regulatory environment it introduces participants to alternative styles and approaches to supervision. The changing role of supervisors over the length of the student's research programme is discussed and particular attention is devoted to the role and nature of the examination process. Alternative modes and processes of reflection are introduced and related to professional development and the supervisory process.

The assignment should reflect on a particular element of supervisory practice. The assignment is seeking evidence of the learning outcomes above. In determining whether the assignment meets the criteria set, your assessors will be looking for evidence of your ability to learn from experience and to define complex situations for critical analysis, as well as your abilities to evaluate both theory and practice. We expect that your assignment will cover the following areas: identification and justification of research question(s); critical review of relevant literature, and evidence of both relation to supervisory practice and of personal reflection.

Delivery will initially be through three-hour structured workshops. In total there will be six workshops over the year. A range of teaching and learning methods will be utilied including case studies, videos, group discussion and presentations by experienced practitioners. A key element is the use of mentors, experienced supervisors in a subject related to those of the participants. Mentors act as a primary source of accessible expertise for new or inexperienced supervisors participating in the module. To enable experiential learning, mentors will arrange for each participant to experience at least six months as a member of a supervisory team(s) in an area related to their own expertise. Participants will be encouraged to maintain a reflective log during this period and, subject to appropriate consents being gained, to utilise this in the preparation of their assignment.

The module is primarily practice-based, but participants will be provided with guidance regarding further reading. In particular participants will be encouraged to consult:

Delamont, S., Atkinson, P. and Parry, O. (2004) Supervising the Doctorate: a guide to success, 2nd Ed., Open University Press, Maidenhead.

Phillips, E and Pugh, D. (2004) How to Get a PhD: a handbook for students and their supervisors, 3rd Ed., Open University Press, Maidenhead.

None

The module handbook provides an introduction to the current relevant literature and a specialist bibliography is provided on reflective practice. Current research degree regulations and QAA best practice guidelines will be made available and discussed.