Module Descriptors
LEADERSHIP ROLE IN QUALITY, INNOVATION AND CHANGE
NURS70664
Key Facts
Health, Education, Policing and Sciences
Level 7
15 credits
Contact
Leader: Edward Tolhurst
Hours of Study
Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities: 30
Independent Study Hours: 120
Total Learning Hours: 150
Assessment
  • PRESENTATION - INDIVIDUAL weighted at 100%
Module Details
Module Learning Strategies
Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities: (30 hours)
Teacher / student contact hours
10 hours - Facilitated Action Learning
20 hours - A series of keynote lectures; seminars, presentations and tutorials

Guided Independent Study: (120 hours)
100 hours- Independent learning activities based on critical reflection of the students own needs. This might include shadowing and visits to alternative practice settings, reflective writing/journals, learning contracts, preparation for action learning
20 hours - The importance of the patient experience and patient empowerment and involvement will be achieved through the series of patient observations and stories followed by analysis and feedback in a group setting

Module Resources
A mentor within an advanced leadership role (e.g. Nursing Director, Professional Development Officer. Professional Executive Committee Board member) who is willing to take part in discussions with the student, offer guidance/direction on leadership issues and facilitate action planning and goal setting. They will form an integrated part of the students development in their leadership role.
Peers; practice colleagues.
Computer hardware and software, Internet access.
Printer
Flipcharts, pens, `Power point' equipment.
Room conducive to small group work
Library resources
Blackboard
Module Special Admissions Requirements
Professional registration in a health care discipline

Module Texts
Burnes, B. (2009) Managing Change, London, Prentice Hall
McSherry, R. & Pearce, P (2010) Clinical Governance, 3rd edition, West Sussex Wiley-Blackwell
Marquis, B. L. & Huston C. J. (2008) Leadership Roles and Management Functions in Nuring and Application, Philadelphia, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Module Indicative Content
The aim of this module is to facilitate senior practitioners working in a leadership role to work collaboratively in leading and implementing change to meet the Clinical Governance and other key quality agendas. The module will focus on direction setting and visionary thinking by encouraging students to be politically aware, gaining understanding of local and national directives and the impact they have on quality issues.
Students will be facilitated to explore and evaluate audit outcomes, standards, benchmarks and patient experiences and the impact on resource management. Analysis and evaluation of patient/client feedback will be used to identify and propose change and the resolution of practice issues.Principles of change management and risk management strategies will be critically analysed.
Module Additional Assessment Details
A presentation 50 mins (40 mins presentation, 10 mins questioning) (100%)
(This meets learning outcomes 1 - 4)
You are required to develop a proposal to support a bid for resources to improve quality of care. The chosen resource could be for an item of equipment, monies to fund a project, additional staff or other service to improve the patient experience and quality of care.
This is to be presented to the student group and module leader, critically examining your role as a leader in influencing/implementing this proposal, drawing on relevant leadership and change theories, and demonstrating your understanding of the relevant audit/benchmarks to support your proposal.

You are required to critically analyse the strategic and operational policies that have underpinned your bid proposal, and how this will impact on the quality and varying approaches to care of patients.
The current political and clinical governance agendas must be critically reflected upon to support the justification of your proposed bid, and how these have influenced your practice.

Formative Feedback on a group presentation based on analysis and evaluation of one patient story and patient observation