Module Descriptors
POLICING IN PARTNERSHIP
POLI70004
Key Facts
Health, Education, Policing and Sciences
Level 7
20 credits
Contact
Leader: Rizwan Mustafa
Hours of Study
Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities: 36
Independent Study Hours: 164
Total Learning Hours: 200
Pattern of Delivery
  • Occurrence B, Stoke Campus, PG Semester 2
Sites
  • Stoke Campus
Assessment
  • Case study essay - 4000 WORDS weighted at 100%
Module Details
MODULE LEARNING OUTCOMES
1.Critically evaluate the possibilities and limitations of police engagement in partnerships and collaborative activity with reference to lawful and professional practice
2.Uncover the complex processes involved in partnership and inter-agency collaboration and thereby identify key components of successful partnership working.
3.Evaluate and critique the strategic fit of policing in partnership with various models of policing.
4.Demonstrate an applied understanding of the fundamentals of project and programme management; how these pertain to the policing, their organisations and their roles.
MODULE ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENT DETAILS
This assessment addresses all of the learning outcomes above.
Students will be required to produce a written case study, which requires the student to research an aspect of partnership or collaborative activity within an organisation, (potentially within a live organisation).
MODULE INDICATIVE CONTENT
To explore the nature, content and purpose of police approaches to partnership working
An examination of the `effectiveness` or otherwise of partnerships
Critique the bureaucracy, administration and structures of police engagement with partnerships
Partnership legalities, contract and informality.
An examination that the medium of partnerships may present to both police culture and police leadership/independence.
A critical review of the Morgan Report 1991 and the concept of a shared responsibility for crime and community safety
Identification that police involvement in partnerships is far wider than the limited focus of crime prevention and community safety
Critique of the opportunities and challenges faced through partnerships and contracts with private sector organisations
An examination of theoretical frameworks and perspectives in which to analyse the emergence of partnerships
Identification and critique of the complex processes involved in partnership and multi-agency working
A review of the discourse between declared policy and how partnerships are realised on the ground.
Partnerships and identification of emerging best practice and its implications for future police reform.
A grounding in the fundamentals of project and programme management
WEB DESCRIPTOR
This postgraduate module provides students with a comprehensive and systematic critique of both the potential opportunities, benefits, limitations and constraints offered to policing by working in partnership with a variety of different and sometimes competing stakeholders. Current policy within the UK encourages partnerships and collaboration between statutory organisations (including the police) and professionals; public and private sectors; with voluntary organisations and local communities.

Candidates will develop critical insights into the knowledge of how to engage in lawful, effective and professional partnership practice. The module will examine the pluralisation of services and theories of convergence, linked to crime and community safety being a shared responsibility. The module will also explore the relevance of partnerships to policing strategies including community policing and problem-oriented policing.

The module will also explore political and academic discourse regarding the current police service’s structure and fitness for purpose and support personal and professional application.
MODULE LEARNING STRATEGIES
The module is delivered by way of online lectures (synchronous and asynchronous), which provides students with an overview of the potential opportunities, benefits, limitations and constraints offered to policing by working in partnership with a variety of different and sometimes competing stakeholders.

Detailed pre-reading will be required before taught sessions, and students will be supervised as they seek to develop ideas for their Independent Studies

Students will gain formative feedback by a series of groups tasks that will be administered within the seminars.

Candidates will receive tuition on referencing technique in the social sciences, guidance on the avoidance of plagiarism, and all submitted coursework by MSc candidates will be expected to systematically follow the Harvard referencing system
MODULE TEXTS
Tilley, N. (2005) Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
Archer, D. and Cameron, A. (2009) Collaborative Leadership: How to Succeed in an Interconnected World. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann
Turner, R. (2014) Handbook of Project Based Management: Leading Strategic Change in Organisations. Farnham: Gower Publishing

Recommended
ACPO (1990) Strategic policy document: setting the standards: meeting community expectations, London: ACPO.
Alderson, J. (1979) Policing Freedom, Plymouth: Macdonald & Evans Ltd.
Audit Commission (1998) A fruitful partnership: Effective partnership working, London: Audit Commission
Berry, G., Briggs., Erol, R. and Staden, L. (2011) Home Office Research Report 52: The Effectiveness of partnership Working in a Crime and Disorder Context, London: Home Office.
Blagg, H., Pearson, G., Sampson, A., Smith, D. and Stubbs. P. (1988) Inter-Agency Co-operation: Rhetoric and Reality, in Hope, T. and Shaw, M. (eds) Communities and Crime Reduction, London: HMSO pp204-20
Burnett, R and Appleton, C. (2004) Joined-Up Services to Tackle Youth Crime, British Journal of Criminology, 44: 34-54
Clark, T. (2002) New Labour`s Big Idea- Joined-up Government. Social Policy and Society. Vol 1:107-117: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, S. (1985) Visions of Social Control, Cambridge: Polity Press
Conservative Party (2007) Policing for the People: interim report of the Police Reform Task Force, London: Conservative Party.
Crawford, A. (1999) The Local Governance of Crime: Appeals to Community and Partnerships, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Doz, Y. (1988). Technology partnerships between smaller and larger firms: Some issues in Contractor, F. and Lorange,P. (eds.) Cooperative strategies in international business: Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Foucault, M. (2011).¿The Government of Self and Others¿: Lectures at the College de France, 1982-1983, . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
Geddes, M. (1997) Partnership Against Poverty and Exclusion? Local Regeneration Strategies and Excluded Communities in the UK, Bristol: the Policy Press
Gelsthorpe, L. (1985). The Community Service Volunteers/Kent Initiative. Report IV in Liddle, M. and Gelsthorpe, L.(1994) Crime Prevention and inter-Agency Co-operation. Police Research Group. Crime Prevention Unit Series No53, London: Home Office pp 2-3
London: Community Service Volunteers.
Glendinning, C., Powell. and Rummery, K. (2002) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Goris, P. (2001) Community Crime Prevention and the Partnership Approach: A Safe Community for Everyone? European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 9 (4): 447-451
Handel, M. (2003) The Sociology of Organizations, California: Sage
Hughes, G. and E.¿McLaughlin¿(2002) `Together We'll Crack It: Partnership and Governance of Crime Prevention', in Glendinning, C and Powell, M and Rummery, K. (2002) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, Bristol: The Policy Press
Kinder, K., Halsey, K,. Kendall., Atkinson, M. and Moore, M. ( 2001) Working out Well: Effective Provision for Excluded Pupils, Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Lever, J. (2011) Urban Regeneration Partnerships: A Figurational Critique of Governmentality Theory, Sociology 45(1): 86-1-1: Sage
McLaughlin, E. (2007) The New Policing, London: Sage
Meijlaers, S. (1993) Co-Operating for a Preventive Policy in Fijnaut, C., Goethals, J., Peters, T. and Walgrave, L. (eds) (1995) Changes in Society and Criminal Justice in Europe Vol 1,pp 279-283, Cambridge, MA: Kluwer Law International
Mohr, J. and Spekman, R. (1994) Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques. Strategic Management Journal Vol.15, 135-152.
Morgan, J. (1991) Safer Communities: The Local Delivery of Crime Prevention through the Partnership Approach, London: Home Office.
Newburn, T. (2005) Policing: Key Readings. London: Willan
Newburn, T.(2008) Handbook of Policing, London: Willan
Pearce, N. and Hillman (1998) Wasted Youth: Raising Achievement and Tackling Social Exclusion, London: Institute for Policy Research
Pearson,G., Blagg,H., Smith, D., Sampson, A. and Stubbs, P. (1992) Crime, Community and Conflict: The Multi-Agency Approach in Downes, D. (ed) Unraveling Criminal Justice, London: Macmillan. pp. 46-72
Pollitt, C. (2002) The New Public Management in International Perspective: An Analysis of Impacts and Effects in McLaughlin,K., Osbourne,P.and Ferlie, E. (eds) New Public Management: Future Trends and Current Prospects, London: Routledge
Powell, W. (2003) Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organizations in Handel, M. (ed)The Sociology of Organizations, California: Sage pp 315- 330
Poxton, R. (ed) (1999) Working Across The Boundaries, London: Kings FunPratt, J. (1989) Corporatism: The Third Model of Juvenile Justice, British Journal of Criminology, 29/3:236-54
Reiner, R. (2010) The Politics of the Police (4th ed.), Oxford: OUP
Ritzer, G. (2011) The MacDonalization of Society 6, London: Sage
Sampson, A., Blagg, H., Stubbs, P. and Pearson, G. (1988) Crime Localities and the Multi-Agency Approach, British Journal of Criminology, 28 (4): 478-493
Savage, S. (2007), Police Reform: Forces for Change, Oxford: OUP
Scarman, Lord.(1982) Report into the Brixton Riots. London: HMSO
Secker, J and Hill, K. (2001) Broadening the Partnerships: Experiences of Working Across Community Agencies, Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15(4): 341-50
Skinns, L. (2008) A Prominent Participant? The Role of the State in Police Partnerships, Policing and Society, 18(3): 311-321
Tuck, M. (1988) Crime Prevention: A Shift in Concept, Home Office Research Bulletin No.24.London: Home Office
MODULE RESOURCES
During this module, you will be encouraged to utilise Microsoft Teams and Blackboard Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) to support your learning. You will be invited to collaborate with students and academic staff virtually through Microsoft Teams. You will have access to a range of materials on Blackboard VLE including articles, lecture slides, and interactive activities. You will also be able to access a variety of digital material through our¿Library¿and¿specialist¿databases.