Trainees will organise and deliver a ten minute presentation to the key stakeholders in the service being evaluated 0% weighting, (addressing LO's 1, 2 and 6).

The trainees will produce a comprehensive report of the service evaluation for the team consisting of a 500 word executive summary and 3,500 report. 80% weighting, (addressing LO's 2 and 6).

Each trainee will produce a reflective commentary of 1,000 words (or up to ten minute podcast) on their experience of undertaking the evaluation 20% weighting, (addressing LO5).

All assessments must be passed and all learning outcomes must be achieved.

Additional Assessment Details (include formative feedback / assessment):
Formative feedback will be given on the presentation and on the final report before submission to the service.

In this module you will undertake a piece of “real world” audit and evaluation within the service with which you have an employment (or honorary employment) contract. You will work collaboratively with your training colleagues and service heads to produce a comprehensive and meaningful service audit and or evaluation. You will learn about a range of leadership styles and be able to apply them to your own practice. You will be required to take on a leadership role in relation to at least one clear element of a service evaluation. To help you to identify areas of good practice you will participate in a series of workshops where clinical psychologists will share areas of good (and challenging) practice within the region.

Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities: (84 hours)
77 hours will be allocated to workshops in relation to the service evaluation.
7 hours will be allocated to time spent with service leads identifying and visiting a service to be evaluated.

Guided Independent Study: (216 hours)
216 hours will be spend in independent study.

Access to BPS and Service Development Guidance.
Discussion Board and shared learning space on Blackboard.
Visiting lecturers.
Computer.
Projector to use for presentations within service.

Robson, C (2011). Real World Research. Wiley.
Wolfensberger, W., and Thomas, S. (2007). PASSING. A tool for analysing service quality according to social role valorisation criteria. Syracuse, NY.
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
British Psychological Society (2014). DCP: Clinical Leadership Framework.

Minimum entry level criteria for entry to Doctorate in Clinical Psychology.

1. Work in collaboration with Trust leads to identify, review and appraise a service which needs evaluating to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of current contextual drivers on service provision. (Knowledge & Understanding)

2. Choose an appropriate method to evaluate a service and to collaborate and problem solve in partnership with service providers. (Problem Solving)

3. Develop clear goals for service development, which show a critical understanding of safe and non-discriminatory practice. (Analysis, Application)

4. Demonstrate a critical understanding of models of leadership and to be able to reflect on own leadership style within a professional context. (Reflection)

5. Be able to present and communicate ideas around service provision in a clear and succinct manner to commissioners and/or service leads. (Communication)

In this module you will undertake a piece of “real world” audit and evaluation within the service with which you have an employment (or honorary employment) contract. You will work collaboratively with your training colleagues and service heads to produce a comprehensive and meaningful service audit and or evaluation. You will learn about a range of leadership styles and be able to apply them to your own practice. You will be required to take on a leadership role in relation to at least one clear element of a service evaluation. To help you to identify areas of good practice you will participate in a series of workshops where clinical psychologists will share areas of good (and challenging) practice within the region.